A couple days ago, Ted Turner jumped on the one-child bandwagon at the Cancun climate change farce, lecturing the audience about the planetary virtues of sub-replacement fertility. Among the creepy untermensch solutions Turner proposed to solving the world’s population “problem” was the selling of fertility rights, so that poor people could make some bucks by letting their betters reproduce for them. (Where are the people worried about “disparate impact” when you need them?)
As an antidote to Turner’s foolishness, it’s worth looking at an essay posted over the weekend by David Stokes. It’s about one of Teddy Roosevelt’s more famous speeches—his April 23, 1910 address to the Sorbonne, “Citizenship in a Republic.”
Recommended Stories
People tend to remember that speech for the “man in the arena” section. (Which is memorialized at the fantastic, but tragically overlooked, Teddy Roosevelt Memorial in Washington.) But Stokes points out that there’s another section of the speech worth remembering:
Roosevelt understood how falling fertility rates could threaten a society—he was an early pro-natalist.
This wasn’t the only time T.R. argued for fertility. On March 13, 1905 he addressed the National Congress of Mothers (the forerunner of today’s PTA) with a speech about motherhood and the family. It’s full of retrograde brilliance:
No piled-up wealth, no splendor of material growth, no brilliance of artistic development, will permanently avail any people unless its home life is healthy, unless the average man possesses honesty, courage, common sense, and decency, unless he works hard and is willing at need to fight hard; and unless the average woman is a good wife, a good mother, able and willing to perform the first and greatest duty of womanhood, able and willing to bear, and to bring up as they should be brought up, healthy children, sound in body, mind, and character, and numerous enough so that the race shall increase and not decrease.
T.R. has all sorts of troglodytic notions about the comparative advantages of men and women. But these were born of his admiration for the supreme importance of child-rearing:
It’s crackerjack stuff and worth reading in full. The most interesting part of the text is when Roosevelt foresees the creation of a global class of childfree folks, such as Japan’s parasaito shinguru:
Ted Turner would be horrified. Or maybe not. The billionaire who wants the rest of the planet to stop having children has five kids himself.
