Veto #1: House vote to cut off abortion funding

The White House just announced that the House plan to restrict taxpayer funding for abortion could face the first veto of the year.

“If the president were presented with H.R. 7, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto this bill,” said a White House statement of administration policy.

The House plans to pass the “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act” today as a symbolic act to herald the annual March for Life protest of the 1973 Roe v. Wade victory for abortion rights.

Experts said that prohibition is mostly already in place, though it would increase restrictions on tax dollars flowing to Obamacare. It has been passed before.

The vote follows a decision by House leaders to scrap a tougher anti-abortion bill.

From the White House:

The Administration strongly opposes H.R. 7. The legislation would intrude on women’s reproductive freedom and access to health care; increase the financial burden on many Americans; unnecessarily restrict the private insurance choices that consumers have today; and restrict the District of Columbia’s use of local funds, which undermines home rule. Longstanding Federal policy prohibits the use of Federal funds for abortions, except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered. This prohibition is maintained in the Affordable Care Act and reinforced through the President’s Executive Order 13535. H.R. 7 would go well beyond these safeguards by interfering with consumers’ private health care choices. The Administration strongly opposes legislation that unnecessarily restricts women’s reproductive freedoms and consumers’ private insurance options.
If the President were presented with H.R. 7, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto this bill.

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner’s “Washington Secrets” columnist, can be contacted at [email protected].

Related Content