The Atlantic points to a study where two Oxford researchers concluded that machines “are likely to take over 47 percent of today’s jobs within a few decades.”

Robots, however, discriminate.

Jobs held by women, primarily, are at less risk of technological obsolescence than jobs held primarily by men. Potentially, a large economic shift grows on the horizon.

Male-dominated professions tend to require physical labor — lumberjacks, construction workers, etc. Some jobs are at risk, regardless of physical requirements; commodity traders could face replacement by sophisticated algorithms.

Robots can analyze large volumes of data and save labor. Female-dominated professions such as nursing, in contrast, require emotional sensitivity and critical-thinking, skills that robots cannot emulate so easily.

It’s important to look beyond the possibilities of robots. Labor-saving and cost-saving robots don’t just “destroy” jobs.

They lower costs for businesses ­— and consumers — that spurs more innovation, productivity, and jobs. The economist Joseph Schumpeter referred to this process as “creative destruction,” where one model becomes outmoded by the creation of a new model.

Rather than a future where women become the breadwinners as men fail to compete in the economy, new avenues will open for economic development and growth.

All hail the new robot overlords.